User talk:Shoppingsurat

From Openmoko

Revision as of 11:23, 13 April 2008 by Dolson (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Dear Mr. Smith,

This site is not part of Wikipedia. This is a site intended to contain information about the Openmoko project. Your original posting contained nothing remotely related to this project. It was full of statements about things such as how women in India love clothing made in Surat. Nothing related to Openmoko, open source software, or cell phones was mentioned.

The fact that you say "I have no idea if this website is a part of www.wikipedia.org." is rather telling. It is a good idea to figure out what information a site is trying to present before you post information on it.

I'm sorry if I offended you - I honestly thought someone had created a bot that posted an advertisement about Surat on wiki pages, because when someone (not me) deleted the page, it re-appeared very quickly. Nonetheless I believe this page should be deleted completely - it has nothing to do with Openmoko.

Surat, India or Khoobsoorat Surat

Some bot or equally stupid person keeps posting an advertisement here. When this page is deleted, the Ad. gets reposted.


I am dissapointed with your behavior. I cannot understand wht do you want actualy.I cannot understand why do you call a simple article an Ad.I have no idea if this website is a part of www.wikipedia.org . I am 100% it cannot be. You need to take a deep lesssion from this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surat. Does it not have external links?. What do you expect? Visitors should stay only to your site? should not they have any external links?

How disgusting and cheap this looks?

1.You delete the article and dont even have decency to inform the user through email if unknowingly they may have made mistake.Though the user is a registered member of your site. 2. You directly write foul message on your site." stupid person". Is this ethical? is this a good sign of a mature site? Have u ever seen such message on www.wikipedia.org ?

My firend, I am not sad because you have deleted my article but, how your system work. You lebel your site as GNU. But at another end you have Draconion laws applied.Though I am not saying that you have no right to delete fould and objectionable message. But was my article objectionable? just it had one external link. You must take lesson from www.wikipedia.org who is greatest free site in the world. I love it.I am trying to reach highest body of your site and have copied the text you have written here and will email him. Because I am sure I have not violeted your terms and condition. Just I wrote. "Related links". Thats it.

Thanks,

Anjelina Smith.

Retrieved from "http://wiki.openmoko.org/index.php?title=User_talk:Shoppingsurat&oldid=28489"
Personal tools

Dear Mr. Smith,

This site is not part of Wikipedia. This is a site intended to contain information about the Openmoko project. Your original posting contained nothing remotely related to this project. It was full of statements about things such as how women in India love clothing made in Surat. Nothing related to Openmoko, open source software, or cell phones was mentioned.

The fact that you say "I have no idea if this website is a part of www.wikipedia.org." is rather telling. It is a good idea to figure out what information a site is trying to present before you post information on it.

I'm sorry if I offended you - I honestly thought someone had created a bot that posted an advertisement about Surat on wiki pages, because when someone (not me) deleted the page, it re-appeared very quickly. Nonetheless I believe this page should be deleted completely - it has nothing to do with Openmoko.

Surat, India or Khoobsoorat Surat

Some bot or equally stupid person keeps posting an advertisement here. When this page is deleted, the Ad. gets reposted.


I am dissapointed with your behavior. I cannot understand wht do you want actualy.I cannot understand why do you call a simple article an Ad.I have no idea if this website is a part of www.wikipedia.org . I am 100% it cannot be. You need to take a deep lesssion from this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surat. Does it not have external links?. What do you expect? Visitors should stay only to your site? should not they have any external links?

How disgusting and cheap this looks?

1.You delete the article and dont even have decency to inform the user through email if unknowingly they may have made mistake.Though the user is a registered member of your site. 2. You directly write foul message on your site." stupid person". Is this ethical? is this a good sign of a mature site? Have u ever seen such message on www.wikipedia.org ?

My firend, I am not sad because you have deleted my article but, how your system work. You lebel your site as GNU. But at another end you have Draconion laws applied.Though I am not saying that you have no right to delete fould and objectionable message. But was my article objectionable? just it had one external link. You must take lesson from www.wikipedia.org who is greatest free site in the world. I love it.I am trying to reach highest body of your site and have copied the text you have written here and will email him. Because I am sure I have not violeted your terms and condition. Just I wrote. "Related links". Thats it.

Thanks,

Anjelina Smith.