Talk:Hammerhead/Protocol

From Openmoko

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Um... Pavel, maybe I'm missing something here, but I think what you're calling "received packet 00" is what I'm calling packet 10.  Are you saying that the high nibble of the packet type doesn't matter?  Because I can't see any particular connection between these packets and the type 00 packets that gltt sends.  Likewise what you're calling packet 03 has a type byte of 23, and 0D has a type byte of 9D.  (I'm pretty sure that the high nibble is important.  For another example, look at packet type 0E versus 9E.) [[User:FloppusMaximus|FM]] 23:24, 6 May 2007 (CEST)
 
Um... Pavel, maybe I'm missing something here, but I think what you're calling "received packet 00" is what I'm calling packet 10.  Are you saying that the high nibble of the packet type doesn't matter?  Because I can't see any particular connection between these packets and the type 00 packets that gltt sends.  Likewise what you're calling packet 03 has a type byte of 23, and 0D has a type byte of 9D.  (I'm pretty sure that the high nibble is important.  For another example, look at packet type 0E versus 9E.) [[User:FloppusMaximus|FM]] 23:24, 6 May 2007 (CEST)
 +
 +
Since you never answered, I fixed the headings.  I don't have much time to work on this at the moment, so that's basically all I did.  Also I'm not sure what you're talking about w.r.t packet 06 (/16?) so I left that alone.  If you disagree with my analysis, that's fine, and please say so. [[User:FloppusMaximus|FM]] 13:32, 17 May 2007 (CEST)

Revision as of 13:32, 17 May 2007

Um... Pavel, maybe I'm missing something here, but I think what you're calling "received packet 00" is what I'm calling packet 10. Are you saying that the high nibble of the packet type doesn't matter? Because I can't see any particular connection between these packets and the type 00 packets that gltt sends. Likewise what you're calling packet 03 has a type byte of 23, and 0D has a type byte of 9D. (I'm pretty sure that the high nibble is important. For another example, look at packet type 0E versus 9E.) FM 23:24, 6 May 2007 (CEST)

Since you never answered, I fixed the headings. I don't have much time to work on this at the moment, so that's basically all I did. Also I'm not sure what you're talking about w.r.t packet 06 (/16?) so I left that alone. If you disagree with my analysis, that's fine, and please say so. FM 13:32, 17 May 2007 (CEST)

Personal tools

Um... Pavel, maybe I'm missing something here, but I think what you're calling "received packet 00" is what I'm calling packet 10. Are you saying that the high nibble of the packet type doesn't matter? Because I can't see any particular connection between these packets and the type 00 packets that gltt sends. Likewise what you're calling packet 03 has a type byte of 23, and 0D has a type byte of 9D. (I'm pretty sure that the high nibble is important. For another example, look at packet type 0E versus 9E.) FM 23:24, 6 May 2007 (CEST)