|
|
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | Dear Mr. Smith,
| |
| | | |
− | This site is not part of Wikipedia. This is a site intended to contain
| |
− | information about the Openmoko project. Your original posting contained
| |
− | nothing remotely related to this project. It was full of statements
| |
− | about things such as how women in India love clothing made in Surat.
| |
− | Nothing related to Openmoko, open source software, or cell phones was
| |
− | mentioned.
| |
− |
| |
− | The fact that you say
| |
− | "I have no idea if this website is a part of www.wikipedia.org." is
| |
− | rather telling. It is a good idea to figure out what information a site is
| |
− | trying to present before you post information on it.
| |
− |
| |
− | I'm sorry if I offended you - I honestly thought someone had created a bot
| |
− | that posted an advertisement about Surat on wiki pages, because when
| |
− | someone (not me) deleted the page, it re-appeared very quickly. Nonetheless
| |
− | I believe this page should be deleted completely - it has nothing to do with Openmoko.
| |
− |
| |
− | -------------------------------------------
| |
− |
| |
− | Surat, India or Khoobsoorat Surat
| |
− |
| |
− | Some bot or equally stupid person keeps posting an advertisement here. When this page
| |
− | is deleted, the Ad. gets reposted.
| |
− |
| |
− |
| |
− | I am dissapointed with your behavior. I cannot understand wht do you want actualy.I cannot understand why do you call a simple article an Ad.I have no idea if this website is a part of www.wikipedia.org . I am 100% it cannot be. You need to take a deep lesssion from this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surat. Does it not have external links?. What do you expect? Visitors should stay only to your site? should not they have any external links?
| |
− |
| |
− | How disgusting and cheap this looks?
| |
− |
| |
− | 1.You delete the article and dont even have decency to inform the user through email if unknowingly they may have made mistake.Though the user is a registered member of your site.
| |
− | 2. You directly write foul message on your site." stupid person". Is this ethical? is this a good sign of a mature site? Have u ever seen such message on www.wikipedia.org ?
| |
− |
| |
− | My firend, I am not sad because you have deleted my article but, how your system work. You lebel your site as GNU. But at another end you have Draconion laws applied.Though I am not saying that you have no right to delete fould and objectionable message. But was my article objectionable? just it had one external link.
| |
− | You must take lesson from www.wikipedia.org who is greatest free site in the world. I love it.I am trying to reach highest body of your site and have copied the text you have written here and will email him. Because I am sure I have not violeted your terms and condition. Just I wrote. "Related links". Thats it.
| |
− |
| |
− | Thanks,
| |
− |
| |
− | Anjelina Smith.
| |