User talk:HaraldWelte - Revision history

Rovo: Mediawiki Skin

2007-09-07T20:32:33Z

Mediawiki Skin

HaraldWelte: /* dfu-util for Windows? */

2007-08-30T06:22:59Z

‎dfu-util for Windows?

Hhf423: /* dfu-util for Windows? */

2007-08-23T11:57:30Z

‎dfu-util for Windows?

HaraldWelte at 05:00, 23 August 2007

2007-08-23T05:00:16Z

Hhf423: dfu-util for Windows?

2007-08-17T08:58:30Z

dfu-util for Windows?

Menges at 11:14, 16 August 2007

2007-08-16T11:14:41Z

Menges at 11:07, 16 August 2007

2007-08-16T11:07:36Z

HaraldWelte: sita reverse lookup changed. power management has long been update

2007-08-16T00:55:21Z

sita reverse lookup changed. power management has long been update

Menges at 19:49, 13 August 2007

2007-08-13T19:49:37Z

Speedevil: Add comment about PM.

2007-07-14T13:54:30Z

Add comment about PM.

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:32, 7 September 2007
Line 1:	Line 1:

	+
	+	== Mediawiki Skin ==
	+
	+	Hello, I am just trying to figure out if there is some way I can use the mediawiki skin you have here on this wiki. Thank you--[[User:Rovo\|Rovo]] 22:32, 7 September 2007 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:22, 30 August 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:

−	~~== dfu-util for Windows? ==~~
−
−	~~laforge * r2719 /trunk/src/host/dfu-util/src/sam7dfu.c: make dfu-util produce a working binary on Win32 platforms~~
−
−	~~Hi Harald, does that mean there is a binary somewhere yet? Thanks, [[User:hhf423\|hhf423]]~~
−
−	~~Not within OpenMoko. There might be some windows users in the community who might have precompiled binaries.~~
−
−	Well, at least for now this does not seem to be the case. Does that mean OpenMoko will not aim for Windows users for the non-developer edition or that Windows users are not expected to flash, e.g. just use ipkg updates? Given the you can aparently get sued in the US for not providing a user replaceable battery, it probably should be stated big on the package (and in the shop) that Windows is not supported by OpenMoko ;-) [[User:hhf423\|hhf423]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:57, 23 August 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:

	Not within OpenMoko. There might be some windows users in the community who might have precompiled binaries.		Not within OpenMoko. There might be some windows users in the community who might have precompiled binaries.
		+
		+	Well, at least for now this does not seem to be the case. Does that mean OpenMoko will not aim for Windows users for the non-developer edition or that Windows users are not expected to flash, e.g. just use ipkg updates? Given the you can aparently get sued in the US for not providing a user replaceable battery, it probably should be stated big on the package (and in the shop) that Windows is not supported by OpenMoko ;-) [[User:hhf423\|hhf423]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:00, 23 August 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~--[[User:Menges\|Menges]] 21:49, 13 August 2007 (CEST) account-creation-email<br>~~
−	~~:please forward to: mail-server-admin (i saw in the list you do it? :-))) )~~
−	~~:our mailserver blocked the response email comming from 88.198.124.203 this machine answers with openmoko.org but the reverse MX lookup got a <tt>sita.openmoko.org</tt>?<br>~~
−	~~:to counteract missunderstanding: the meaning of the message is more to got information if our server is configured 'strict but correct' then to ask you to reconfigure your server - Thanks a lot!~~
−
−	~~-- [[User:HaraldWelte\|Harald]] what do you mean by 'answers with openmoko.org' ?~~
−	~~I just checked, and the setup is as follows:~~
−	~~openmoko.org has a MX record pointing to sita.openmoko.org~~
−	~~if you telnet to sita.openmoko.org port 25, you get:~~
−	~~<pre>~~
−	~~Connected to sita.openmoko.org.~~
−	~~Escape character is '^]'.~~
−	~~220 sita.openmoko.org ESMTP Exim 4.50 Thu, 16 Aug 2007 02:50:19 +0200~~
−	~~</pre>~~
−	so the system is actually referring to itself as sita.openmoko.org, not just openmoko.org. Checking further, it seems like the reverse lookup indeed was just openmoko.org, not sita.openmoko.org. It's changed now, but will take some time to propagate through DNS.
−
−
−	~~--[[User:Menges\|Menges]] 13:07, 16 August 2007 (CEST) Thats it! Thanks now 'everything' is fine! I'm happy, ...admins against spam!~~
−	~~:we received the missing mail!~~

	== dfu-util for Windows? ==		== dfu-util for Windows? ==
Line 24:		Line 5:

	Hi Harald, does that mean there is a binary somewhere yet? Thanks, [[User:hhf423\|hhf423]]		Hi Harald, does that mean there is a binary somewhere yet? Thanks, [[User:hhf423\|hhf423]]
		+
		+	Not within OpenMoko. There might be some windows users in the community who might have precompiled binaries.

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:58, 17 August 2007
Line 18:		Line 18:
	--[[User:Menges\|Menges]] 13:07, 16 August 2007 (CEST) Thats it! Thanks now 'everything' is fine! I'm happy, ...admins against spam!		--[[User:Menges\|Menges]] 13:07, 16 August 2007 (CEST) Thats it! Thanks now 'everything' is fine! I'm happy, ...admins against spam!
	:we received the missing mail!		:we received the missing mail!
		+
		+	== dfu-util for Windows? ==
		+
		+	laforge * r2719 /trunk/src/host/dfu-util/src/sam7dfu.c: make dfu-util produce a working binary on Win32 platforms
		+
		+	Hi Harald, does that mean there is a binary somewhere yet? Thanks, [[User:hhf423\|hhf423]]

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 :please forward to: mail-server-admin (i saw in the list you do it? :-))) )
 :our mailserver blocked the response email comming from 88.198.124.203 this machine answers with openmoko.org but the reverse MX lookup got a <tt>sita.openmoko.org</tt>?<br>
-:to couteract missunderstanding: the meaning of the message is more to got information if our server is configured 'strict but correct' then to ask you to reconfigure your server - Thanks a lot!
+:to counteract missunderstanding: the meaning of the message is more to got information if our server is configured 'strict but correct' then to ask you to reconfigure your server - Thanks a lot!
 -- [[User:HaraldWelte|Harald]] what do you mean by 'answers with openmoko.org' ?

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:07, 16 August 2007
Line 14:		Line 14:
	</pre>		</pre>
	so the system is actually referring to itself as sita.openmoko.org, not just openmoko.org. Checking further, it seems like the reverse lookup indeed was just openmoko.org, not sita.openmoko.org. It's changed now, but will take some time to propagate through DNS.		so the system is actually referring to itself as sita.openmoko.org, not just openmoko.org. Checking further, it seems like the reverse lookup indeed was just openmoko.org, not sita.openmoko.org. It's changed now, but will take some time to propagate through DNS.
		+
		+
		+	--[[User:Menges\|Menges]] 13:07, 16 August 2007 (CEST) Thats it! Thanks now 'everything' is fine! I'm happy, ...admins against spam!
		+	:we received the missing mail!

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 :to couteract missunderstanding: the meaning of the message is more to got information if our server is configured 'strict but correct' then to ask you to reconfigure your server - Thanks a lot!
+-- [[User:HaraldWelte|Harald]] what do you mean by 'answers with openmoko.org' ?
-The http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Neo1973_Power_Management page seems to be somewhat out of date, and needs updated for P1 by someone with schematics, there are a number of references to reportedly fixed bugs in the P0 hardware.
+I just checked, and the setup is as follows:
-Thanks!
+openmoko.org has a MX record pointing to sita.openmoko.org
---[[User:Speedevil|Speedevil]] 15:54, 14 July 2007 (CEST)
+if you telnet to sita.openmoko.org port 25, you get:

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-You're listed as one of the wiki admins -
+The http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Neo1973_Power_Management page seems to be somewhat out of date, and needs updated for P1 by someone with schematics, there are a number of references to reportedly fixed bugs in the P0 hardware.
-Would it be possible to install the spam blacklist plugin - as described on http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Combating_spam?
+Thanks!
+--[[User:Speedevil|Speedevil]] 15:54, 14 July 2007 (CEST)
-The [http://svn.wikimedia.org/svnroot/mediawiki/trunk/extensions/SpamBlacklist/README README].
-−
-Rationale: [[Special:RecentChanges]]
---[[User:Speedevil|Speedevil]] 20:49, 10 June 2007 (CEST)
-−
-−
-The problem is that we currently run debian sarge on our production systems, with a policy of not using anything != debian sarge package unless absolutely neccessary.  The spam plugin requires mediawiki-1.9, which in turn requires php5, which in turn requires debian 4.
-−
-Yes, we want to migrate at some point, but we have many other things to do [mostly: getting the phones shipping!] right now. Sorry for this inconvenience
-−
---[[User:HaraldWelte]]. 10:51, 11 June 2007 (CST)