Talk:Wishlist/Sensorbox

From Openmoko

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(N.N.)
(User:Hns)
Line 24: Line 24:
  
 
== [[User:Hns]] ==
 
== [[User:Hns]] ==
This is what has been thought of: a simple processor that still suppports A/D converters and USB. A good candidate appears to be http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/41124c.pdf Cost is approx. 5 USD.
+
This is what has been thought of: a simple processor that still suppports A/D converters and USB. A good candidate appears to be [http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/41124c.pdf | PIC16C765] Cost is approx. 5 USD.
  
 
Using an ARM processor just to convert some samples per second into USB appears to be overkill to me on first though. But the PIC is just one of the options to considered. A drawback appears that the ADC resolution is just 8 bit. This is quite coarse for some sensors. 12 bit would be better...
 
Using an ARM processor just to convert some samples per second into USB appears to be overkill to me on first though. But the PIC is just one of the options to considered. A drawback appears that the ADC resolution is just 8 bit. This is quite coarse for some sensors. 12 bit would be better...

Revision as of 15:07, 2 November 2008

Processor discussion

N.N.

User:Hns

This is what has been thought of: a simple processor that still suppports A/D converters and USB. A good candidate appears to be | PIC16C765 Cost is approx. 5 USD.

Using an ARM processor just to convert some samples per second into USB appears to be overkill to me on first though. But the PIC is just one of the options to considered. A drawback appears that the ADC resolution is just 8 bit. This is quite coarse for some sensors. 12 bit would be better...

So what we need:

  • single chip
  • supports USB and approx. 8 ADC channels without many external components
  • low power
  • readily available development tools
Personal tools

Processor discussion

N.N.

User:Hns

This is what has been thought of: a simple processor that still suppports A/D converters and USB. A good candidate appears to be http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/41124c.pdf Cost is approx. 5 USD.

Using an ARM processor just to convert some samples per second into USB appears to be overkill to me on first though. But the PIC is just one of the options to considered. A drawback appears that the ADC resolution is just 8 bit. This is quite coarse for some sensors. 12 bit would be better...

So what we need:

  • single chip
  • supports USB and approx. 8 ADC channels without many external components
  • low power
  • readily available development tools