Talk:November 6, 2007 Community Update - Revision history

Emunson at 21:53, 27 November 2007

2007-11-27T21:53:06Z

2007-11-27T21:52:22Z

2007-11-27T17:13:38Z

2007-11-26T20:39:58Z

2007-11-26T19:52:03Z

2007-11-16T16:56:44Z

2007-11-16T05:45:18Z

2007-11-14T11:37:53Z

2007-11-12T12:46:31Z

2007-11-12T03:11:07Z

@@ Line 79: / Line 79: @@
 * --[[User:jstaelens|jstaelens]] 11:49, 16 November 2007 (CET) - I travel international and family lives in 850 so quad band is a must.
 * --[[User:SilverWolf|SilverWolf]] 10:01, 16 November 2007 (MST) - I require a quad-band phone. Frankly, it's a mystery to me why the Neo was crippled in the first place. That's worse than the handset feature crippling that goes on with Verizon. There are plenty of (cheap!) quad-band phones in all markets, so it's obviously neither difficult nor expensive to do.
-* --[[User:Eric|Eric]] 13:41, 27 November 2007 (PST) - I require quad band as I travel between the US and Europe.  If Quad-band is not an option fairly soon I will start looking elsewhere for a phone.
+* --[[User:emunson|emunson]] 13:41, 27 November 2007 (PST) - I require quad band as I travel between the US and Europe.  If Quad-band is not an option fairly soon I will start looking elsewhere for a phone.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:52, 27 November 2007
Line 79:		Line 79:
	* --[[User:jstaelens\|jstaelens]] 11:49, 16 November 2007 (CET) - I travel international and family lives in 850 so quad band is a must.		* --[[User:jstaelens\|jstaelens]] 11:49, 16 November 2007 (CET) - I travel international and family lives in 850 so quad band is a must.
	* --[[User:SilverWolf\|SilverWolf]] 10:01, 16 November 2007 (MST) - I require a quad-band phone. Frankly, it's a mystery to me why the Neo was crippled in the first place. That's worse than the handset feature crippling that goes on with Verizon. There are plenty of (cheap!) quad-band phones in all markets, so it's obviously neither difficult nor expensive to do.		* --[[User:SilverWolf\|SilverWolf]] 10:01, 16 November 2007 (MST) - I require a quad-band phone. Frankly, it's a mystery to me why the Neo was crippled in the first place. That's worse than the handset feature crippling that goes on with Verizon. There are plenty of (cheap!) quad-band phones in all markets, so it's obviously neither difficult nor expensive to do.
		+	* --[[User:Eric\|Eric]] 13:41, 27 November 2007 (PST) - I require quad band as I travel between the US and Europe. If Quad-band is not an option fairly soon I will start looking elsewhere for a phone.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:13, 27 November 2007
Line 78:		Line 78:
	* --[[User:Ninja0n3\|Ninja0n3]] 06:45, 16 November 2007 (CET) - I live in Canada (using Rogers Wireless) and travel to Europe so I need Quadband...		* --[[User:Ninja0n3\|Ninja0n3]] 06:45, 16 November 2007 (CET) - I live in Canada (using Rogers Wireless) and travel to Europe so I need Quadband...
	* --[[User:jstaelens\|jstaelens]] 11:49, 16 November 2007 (CET) - I travel international and family lives in 850 so quad band is a must.		* --[[User:jstaelens\|jstaelens]] 11:49, 16 November 2007 (CET) - I travel international and family lives in 850 so quad band is a must.
		+	* --[[User:SilverWolf\|SilverWolf]] 10:01, 16 November 2007 (MST) - I require a quad-band phone. Frankly, it's a mystery to me why the Neo was crippled in the first place. That's worse than the handset feature crippling that goes on with Verizon. There are plenty of (cheap!) quad-band phones in all markets, so it's obviously neither difficult nor expensive to do.

@@ Line 34: / Line 34: @@
 * --[[User:tbova]] 22:02, 11 Nov, 2007 (EST) - Definitely need 850 for North America.
 * --[[User:Taco_vendor]] 13:44, 26 Nov 2007 (CST) - 850/1900 or it's a brick. Quad-band would be better(er), but I'd rather have 850/1900 now than 850/900/1800/1900 later.
 '''Is OK with the current 900/1800/1900MHz variant'''

@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 * --[[User:wsvoorhees]] 1:50, 9 November 2007 (CST) - I'd have to start looking for a new phone, if this one didn't support.
 * --[[User:tbova]] 22:02, 11 Nov, 2007 (EST) - Definitely need 850 for North America.
 '''Is OK with the current 900/1800/1900MHz variant'''

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:56, 16 November 2007
Line 74:		Line 74:
	* -- [[User:effbiai\|effbiai]] 12:38, 12 November 2007 (GMT) - need quad-band for travelling.		* -- [[User:effbiai\|effbiai]] 12:38, 12 November 2007 (GMT) - need quad-band for travelling.
	* --[[User:Ninja0n3\|Ninja0n3]] 06:45, 16 November 2007 (CET) - I live in Canada (using Rogers Wireless) and travel to Europe so I need Quadband...		* --[[User:Ninja0n3\|Ninja0n3]] 06:45, 16 November 2007 (CET) - I live in Canada (using Rogers Wireless) and travel to Europe so I need Quadband...
		+	* --[[User:jstaelens\|jstaelens]] 11:49, 16 November 2007 (CET) - I travel international and family lives in 850 so quad band is a must.

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:45, 16 November 2007
Line 73:		Line 73:
	* -- [[User:Quatrox\|Quatrox]] 21:10, 10 November 2007 (GMT) - 900MHz is necessary in Europe; quad-band is a must when travelling.		* -- [[User:Quatrox\|Quatrox]] 21:10, 10 November 2007 (GMT) - 900MHz is necessary in Europe; quad-band is a must when travelling.
	* -- [[User:effbiai\|effbiai]] 12:38, 12 November 2007 (GMT) - need quad-band for travelling.		* -- [[User:effbiai\|effbiai]] 12:38, 12 November 2007 (GMT) - need quad-band for travelling.
		+	* --[[User:Ninja0n3\|Ninja0n3]] 06:45, 16 November 2007 (CET) - I live in Canada (using Rogers Wireless) and travel to Europe so I need Quadband...

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:37, 14 November 2007
Line 56:		Line 56:
	* -- [[User:zuch\|zuch]] 11:44 IST, 7 November 2007 - I stay in India. The current configuration will work perfectly here. No operator here seems to be using 850MHz.		* -- [[User:zuch\|zuch]] 11:44 IST, 7 November 2007 - I stay in India. The current configuration will work perfectly here. No operator here seems to be using 850MHz.
	* -- [[User:equill\|Equill]] 09:50, 8 November 2007 (AEST) Tri-band is fine. I'm in Australia, travel occasionally to NZ and plan some travel to Europe and bits of Africa. Quad-band would be nice for completeness, but I'm unlikely to miss it.		* -- [[User:equill\|Equill]] 09:50, 8 November 2007 (AEST) Tri-band is fine. I'm in Australia, travel occasionally to NZ and plan some travel to Europe and bits of Africa. Quad-band would be nice for completeness, but I'm unlikely to miss it.
		+	* --[[User:BeSherman\|BeSherman]] 12:37, 14 November 2007 (CET) - I live in Sweden so 900 is a must-have for me.

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:46, 12 November 2007
Line 71:		Line 71:
	* -- [[User:Veggephone\| Veggephone]] 07:53, 9 November 2007 (PST) - Quad-band is a must when traveling. Please make just one quad-band model that works everywhere, not two tri-band variants.		* -- [[User:Veggephone\| Veggephone]] 07:53, 9 November 2007 (PST) - Quad-band is a must when traveling. Please make just one quad-band model that works everywhere, not two tri-band variants.
	* -- [[User:Quatrox\|Quatrox]] 21:10, 10 November 2007 (GMT) - 900MHz is necessary in Europe; quad-band is a must when travelling.		* -- [[User:Quatrox\|Quatrox]] 21:10, 10 November 2007 (GMT) - 900MHz is necessary in Europe; quad-band is a must when travelling.
		+	* -- [[User:effbiai\|effbiai]] 12:38, 12 November 2007 (GMT) - need quad-band for travelling.