Talk:Neo 1973

From Openmoko

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(Phase 1 (GTA01Bv4))
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Phase 1 (GTA01Bv4) ==
 
== Phase 1 (GTA01Bv4) ==
 
So, in the features lists, it is spelt "Neo1973" and "Neo 1973".  Which one is correct then? [[User:Guinness2702|Guinness2702]] 11:43, 11 July 2007 (CEST)
 
So, in the features lists, it is spelt "Neo1973" and "Neo 1973".  Which one is correct then? [[User:Guinness2702|Guinness2702]] 11:43, 11 July 2007 (CEST)
 +
 +
Why is there no usb 2.0? this would be a huge advantage, allowing fast disk i/o, even a vga dongle. [[User:baseline0x0]] 13:45, 9 Augest 2007 (CEST)

Revision as of 19:47, 9 August 2007

Phase 1 (GTA01Bv4)

So, in the features lists, it is spelt "Neo1973" and "Neo 1973". Which one is correct then? Guinness2702 11:43, 11 July 2007 (CEST)

Why is there no usb 2.0? this would be a huge advantage, allowing fast disk i/o, even a vga dongle. User:baseline0x0 13:45, 9 Augest 2007 (CEST)

Personal tools

Phase 1 (GTA01Bv4)

So, in the features lists, it is spelt "Neo1973" and "Neo 1973". Which one is correct then? Guinness2702 11:43, 11 July 2007 (CEST)

Why is there no usb 2.0? this would be a huge advantage, allowing fast disk i/o, even a vga dongle. User:baseline0x0 13:45, 9 Augest 2007 (CEST)