Talk:Community Updates/2010-01-14

From Openmoko

< Talk:Community Updates(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Vanous-Leadman discussion)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Vanous-Leadman discussion==
+
Released. Discussion ended.
hey, based on your message i am moving the shr update. i just have no idea where is the original draft for the distro is, i will erase it, pleae either fill it in or keep empty for the release...
+
 
+
--[[User:Vanous|Vanous]] 12:17, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
+
 
+
ok, have put the draft back, just am not sure it 100% correctly...
+
 
+
--[[User:Vanous|Vanous]] 12:23, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
+
 
+
It is fine now, thanks. Additionally it would be nice to have some references to source materials, like mailing list posts. Take a look on [[Community_Updates]] to see how it looked on previous releases, and how formating of text should lok like. Or if you are short on time, I will re-edit your info later. You might be also interested on "instructions" how to edit CU: [[Talk:Community_Update_Draft]]
+
 
+
--[[User:Leadman|LeadMan]] 12:34, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
+
 
+
i would glad if you do the reedit, i am running out of time these days, thank you. i just added the links to the sources. thank you
+
 
+
--[[User:Vanous|Vanous]] 13:22, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
+
 
+
ok, i will. And thanks for the sources. --[[User:Leadman|LeadMan]] 13:53, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
+
 
+
Arrghhh... you beat me with Genady's kernel news ;) --[[User:Leadman|LeadMan]] 16:15, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
+
 
+
sorry, did i overwrite your edit? If so, sorry --[[User:Vanous|Vanous]] 18:44, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
+

Latest revision as of 18:30, 15 January 2010

Released. Discussion ended.

Personal tools

Vanous-Leadman discussion

hey, based on your message i am moving the shr update. i just have no idea where is the original draft for the distro is, i will erase it, pleae either fill it in or keep empty for the release...

--Vanous 12:17, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

ok, have put the draft back, just am not sure it 100% correctly...

--Vanous 12:23, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

It is fine now, thanks. Additionally it would be nice to have some references to source materials, like mailing list posts. Take a look on Community_Updates to see how it looked on previous releases, and how formating of text should lok like. Or if you are short on time, I will re-edit your info later. You might be also interested on "instructions" how to edit CU: Talk:Community_Update_Draft

--LeadMan 12:34, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

i would glad if you do the reedit, i am running out of time these days, thank you. i just added the links to the sources. thank you

--Vanous 13:22, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

ok, i will. And thanks for the sources. --LeadMan 13:53, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Arrghhh... you beat me with Genady's kernel news ;) --LeadMan 16:15, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

sorry, did i overwrite your edit? If so, sorry --Vanous 18:44, 14 January 2010 (UTC)