Talk:Community Updates/2010-01-14

From Openmoko

< Talk:Community Updates(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Vanous-Leadman discussion: fix)
(+Genady)
Line 17: Line 17:
  
 
ok, i will. And thanks for the sources. --[[User:Leadman|LeadMan]] 13:53, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 
ok, i will. And thanks for the sources. --[[User:Leadman|LeadMan]] 13:53, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
Arrghhh... you beat me with Genady's kernel news ;) --[[User:Leadman|LeadMan]] 16:15, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:15, 14 January 2010

Vanous-Leadman discussion

hey, based on your message i am moving the shr update. i just have no idea where is the original draft for the distro is, i will erase it, pleae either fill it in or keep empty for the release...

--Vanous 12:17, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

ok, have put the draft back, just am not sure it 100% correctly...

--Vanous 12:23, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

It is fine now, thanks. Additionally it would be nice to have some references to source materials, like mailing list posts. Take a look on Community_Updates to see how it looked on previous releases, and how formating of text should lok like. Or if you are short on time, I will re-edit your info later. You might be also interested on "instructions" how to edit CU: Talk:Community_Update_Draft

--LeadMan 12:34, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

i would glad if you do the reedit, i am running out of time these days, thank you. i just added the links to the sources. thank you

--Vanous 13:22, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

ok, i will. And thanks for the sources. --LeadMan 13:53, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Arrghhh... you beat me with Genady's kernel news ;) --LeadMan 16:15, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Personal tools

Vanous-Leadman discussion

hey, based on your message i am moving the shr update. i just have no idea where is the original draft for the distro is, i will erase it, pleae either fill it in or keep empty for the release...

--Vanous 12:17, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

ok, have put the draft back, just am not sure it 100% correctly...

--Vanous 12:23, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

It is fine now, thanks. Additionally it would be nice to have some references to source materials, like mailing list posts. Take a look on Community_Updates to see how it looked on previous releases, and how formating of text should lok like. Or if you are short on time, I will re-edit your info later. You might be also interested on "instructions" how to edit CU: Talk:Community_Update_Draft

--LeadMan 12:34, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

i would glad if you do the reedit, i am running out of time these days, thank you. i just added the links to the sources. thank you

--Vanous 13:22, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

ok, i will. And thanks for the sources. --LeadMan 13:53, 14 January 2010 (UTC)