Talk:ElementaryApplications/SHR
From Openmoko
< Talk:ElementaryApplications(Difference between revisions)
(→Neon) |
(→Linphone: new section) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::: I am not clear myself what the difference between EFL and Elementary is, but IMHO [[Neon]] would perfectly fit SHR E look idea. --[[User:Vanous|Vanous]] 12:12, 19 February 2010 (UTC) | :::: I am not clear myself what the difference between EFL and Elementary is, but IMHO [[Neon]] would perfectly fit SHR E look idea. --[[User:Vanous|Vanous]] 12:12, 19 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::::Adding [[Neon]] to the image by default. --[[User:Vanous|Vanous]] 13:03, 21 February 2010 (UTC) | :::::Adding [[Neon]] to the image by default. --[[User:Vanous|Vanous]] 13:03, 21 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Linphone == | ||
+ | |||
+ | I see there isn't a VOIP client on SHR. What do you think about adding Linphone to SHR image? [[User:Zaffo80]] 07:21, 02 March 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:22, 2 March 2010
Neon
Why don't we add neon to our SHR apps? It is an image viewer written in elementary. --→ Airon 12:20, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- No, Neon is written with EFL but it don't use Elementary widget toolkit. It uses only Evas, Ecore and Edje. -- User:Valos 12:58, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- Why don't you used python-elementary? --→ Airon 13:03, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- Elementary didn't exist when I started to write Neon in December 2008. -- User:Valos 14:10, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- Why don't you used python-elementary? --→ Airon 13:03, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Linphone
I see there isn't a VOIP client on SHR. What do you think about adding Linphone to SHR image? User:Zaffo80 07:21, 02 March 2010 (UTC)