Talk:Npkg
From Openmoko
(Difference between revisions)
(New page: doesn't we have opkg as a lightweigt packed manager? isn't leigweigt mostly the same as memory efficient and fast? why should we develop a new, instead of optimizing the opkg one? what did...) |
m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
doesn't we have opkg as a lightweigt packed manager? | doesn't we have opkg as a lightweigt packed manager? | ||
− | isn't | + | isn't ligtweigt mostly the same as memory efficient and fast? |
why should we develop a new, instead of optimizing the | why should we develop a new, instead of optimizing the | ||
opkg one? what did you think to do better than the opkg people? | opkg one? what did you think to do better than the opkg people? | ||
what are the goals that seperates npkg from opkg? | what are the goals that seperates npkg from opkg? | ||
--[[User:Carcinoma|Carcinoma]] 06:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC) | --[[User:Carcinoma|Carcinoma]] 06:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 08:03, 27 July 2009
doesn't we have opkg as a lightweigt packed manager? isn't ligtweigt mostly the same as memory efficient and fast? why should we develop a new, instead of optimizing the opkg one? what did you think to do better than the opkg people? what are the goals that seperates npkg from opkg? --Carcinoma 06:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)